Normal view

Last Post Ever on TypePad

29 September 2025 at 21:21

Well, this is it—the last-ever TOP post on TypePad. TypePad is scheduled to close down tomorrow, although who knows what will happen and when. We'll all see, I guess.

I will be posting for the foreseeable future over on Patreon, where I urge you to become a visitor or, better yet, a supporter. Voluntary donations from readers have become the biggest income generator for The Online Photographer. It has changed many times over the years, first ads, then affiliate income, then print sales, etc., but that's where we are now.

This morning, on Patreon, I published the long-promised version of the Dogs Baker's Dozen with the photographers' comments attached. It was super easy, and a pleasure. I have to say that during its decline, images had become increasingly difficult to publish here on TypePad. It would sometimes take an hour of work (and frustration) to get one to post successfully. Sometimes I'd have to give up and come back to it later. The folks from TypePad couldn't figure out what was wrong, and if they couldn't, I certainly couldn't. Sigh. The handwriting on the wall wasn't that difficult to read. 

At the lower right-hand corner of this site it says, or used to say, "Member Since 06 / 2007." I actually started TOP in 2005 on Blogger—our 20th anniversary is coming right up at the end of November. Considering that my "stretch goal" in 2005 was to keep the blog going for as long as one whole year, that's pretty amazing. A whole year seemed next to impossible in November of 2005. For the most part, it's been the perfect job for me. The work suits my skills and interests, and the circumstances (self-employed, set my own schedule, limp when I'm feeling down and crank when I'm feeling energetic) also suit me. I have no idea how many people have come and gone over those 20 years, but it could easily be well into six figures. And I've been especially lucky in attracting so many great readers. I initially started 'Featuring" comments to foster discussion and a sense of community, but something better happened—I attracted a whole lot of thoughtful, intelligent people with extensive knowledge in this and other fields, and provided an outlet for them to share their own experiences, wisdom, and musings. I have been so influenced by readers I can't even tell you. Virtually every aspect of my life has been touched by something I learned from somebody who reads my blog. 

It's still kind of an open question whether TOP will be able to continue—a forced relaunch on a different site, with a different look and a different setup, is a rough transition even when it's carefully planned for months in advance. Executed pell-mell on short notice and under duress, well, let's just say the conditions are not favorable. But I'll try. It's not like I have much choice. I can't retire. To repeat one of the jokes I like and repeat again and again, "my retirement plan is to keep working." 

Well, I don't want to go on and on, because this could disappear before 24 hours have passed. It's been a good 18 years and three months since June 2007. That's 6,700 days, and I've written something here on most of them—about 9,400 posts total. 

Sic transit gloria mundi (thus passeth the glory of the world). Good luck to us all, and I hope I'll be seeing you! 

Kind regards,
Mike

In the heart of the old Burned-Over District
September 2025

City Life vs. Country Life

25 September 2025 at 20:45

I should probably lead with the good news. it looks like the problem of the old site—this one—is solved. The entire TypePad site, all 17 years of it, will go up on the web as a static resource. You'll be able to search it, illustrations will be present, and some of the links will continue to work.

For the foreseeable, I'm going to be blogging over at Patreon, which you can access at: 

patreon.com/theonlinephotographer

I'm still learning how Patreon works. This morning I wrote an off-topic post as a sort of experiment—tomorrow I'll experiment with a post containing a video. 

At Patreon, you can sign up for free (at the site, look for the three dots underneath the right-hand side of the picture of the lake), or you can just visit, or you can sign up to be a member, a.k.a. supporter, for whatever amount you want, as little as $1 per month. The most common amount is $5 a month. 

Members/supporters see everything, and can comment. Free subscribers and visitors will see all the photographic posts but not the off-topic ones. I figure people who support me like my writing, while people with a free account or who are just visiting come for photography content. They can't comment. That's not my decision—it's just how Patreon is set up.

This morning's OT post is about the many contrasts between the city and the country. In some cases the city wins, like this one: 

"If you live in the city, there are a hundred places to buy whatever you need. In the country, there's one place to buy any particular thing you need, and they will periodically run out of it. In the city, when a store or vendor runs out of something, it will be back in stock within, say, four days. In the country, when a store or vendor runs out of something, you might still be checking whether it's back in stock five weeks later, and at some point it becomes an open question whether you'll ever see it there again."

And in some cases the country wins, like this one:

"In the city, if your car breaks down by the side of the road, large numbers of cars will drive right past you as if you meant to be right there doing just what you're doing, and eventually a cop will help you. In the country, if you get stuck in the mud by the side of the road, a stranger in the very next passing pickup truck will stop, silently rig up a towline by taking it off another piece of equipment he has in his truckbed, pull you out out of the mud, and leave again, having said about eighteen words to you the whole time. He will of course wave off the ten-dollar bill you hold out to him as a thank-you for his time. Even though he could use ten bucks."

If you're NOT a Patreon supporter, would you do me a favor? Go over there and tell me what you can see. You're supposed to see the first paragraph and then come up against a paywall. But I'd like to know how it looks. As the so-called Creator, I can't see what you see.

Not so good
The Patreon compositor is more limited than the one here. For instance, those two quotes above are inset. I can't do that at Patreon. And I'm stuck with the font they provide. But you want to know what bugs me the most? Subheads! I like writing with subheads—they break up the "gray matter" (an old publishing term for unrelieved, unbroken masses of text), and they serve as mileposts for readers skipping forward or back or trying to find something in the post. But the way they're supposed to look is the way the subhead looks at the start of this paragraph—with no line break. Well, I can't do that at Patreon—it has to look like this:

Not so good

With a line break after it. Ugh. Has TOP no standards?! That just looks wrong to me. 

But oh well. Any port in a storm. TypePad is slated to disappear five days from now. 

By the way—fingers crossed—it looks like the problem of the old site—this one—is solved. The entire TypePad site, all 17 years of it, will go up on the web as a static resource. You'll be able to search it, illustrations will be present, and some of the links will continue to work. It doesn't have a URL yet, but it shouldn't be too long now. 

Comments are still open here. 

Mike

Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)

Please Follow Me Over On Patreon

22 September 2025 at 15:21

As we enter the mournful final days of the old TypePad blog, I've temporarily taken up posting at the Patreon site, which I formerly used just as a means of collecting voluntary contributions. There's a new post up over there this morning. The URL is: 

patreon.com/theonlinephotographer

Please bookmark it. Also, soon, my three domains, theonlinephotographer.com, .org, and .net, will all point to it. I haven't done that yet but I will soon. 

Really sad to say goodbye to my home of 17 years, but I'm rather liking Patreon. I like writing on the compositor. It feels a little different somehow. Illustrations can be larger. And, to be frank, I had been having a lot of problems here in recent months. It had become extremely difficult to load and publish illustrations, for example. 

Two little housekeeping details: one is that Patreon doesn't support RSS feeds for posts (sorry! The final WordPress site will have that feature), and the other is that you have to be a paid supporter to leave comments over there. That's the only means of moderating comments, except for deletion. 

Please head over there to see new posts and to leave comments (comments will be closed here from now on, although I'll post new reminders here a few more times).

Thanks for reading all these years, or however long you've been coming! 

Off we go into the future,

Mike

 

Another Idea... (Blog Note)

14 September 2025 at 16:15

[TypePad is closing at the end of this month. If all goes well, a replacement site will be up and running before then at theonlinephotographer.com . We're a-workin' on it.]

How about this idea? How about all the photography-related posts on the public free blog, and off-topic posts added to the Patreon version? 

Note that the Patreon version (you can see the two posts I've put up there so far by going to patreon.com/theonlinephotographer , although I have to figure out how to get rid of that "Featured Products" block which I don't like) has the first part of each post as free public content—anyone can see it. Those people can pay a one-time fee to see the rest of one specific post if they really want to. Patreon contributors see all of every post at Patreon without ever having to pay anything extra.

That gives "Mike fans" (contributors) posts on my random enthusiasms, but keep the public TOP centered more on photographic topics and subjects. That way, visitors to a site called the online photographer don't come for the first time and find a long post about pens, dogs, the weather in the Finger Lakes, keyboards, eating beans, baby robins, or whatever I'm on about.

Of course it also means Patreon contributors might have to toggle back and forth if they want to see the more polished presentation (man, I hope those words don't come back to bite me) on the public free blog site. 

What do you think?

Mike

Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)

More About the Upcoming New Site

12 September 2025 at 02:51

The old (TypePad) site is back, hopefully till Sept. 30th, and the URL is:

https://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/blog_index.html

The new site is currently just a "Coming Soon" page but will be accessible once it goes live at

theonlinephotographer.org

and

theonlinephotographer.com

And by the way, don't worry too much if the new site is pretty rough at first. As I understand it, they're going to build it based just on my verbal descriptions and then give me one pass at fixing whatever I don't like. However, thanks to the 86 people who contributed to the GoFundMe a few days ago, I have enough moolah handy to hire a third party to go into it and fix up anything that's still not right. So we should still be able to get where we want to get to. It might not happen right away, but I'll keep after it.

It's going to look very different than the current site: pretty simple and plain. If all goes well it will just be a blog, on a white background. You might miss the yellowish and tan and earth tones of the old site, but I won't miss having to fill in the backgrounds of illustrations with the old background color. If you don't see something on the new site you want, let me know when the times comes and we'll see what we can do about it. 

The tabs will be Home (the blog itself, which will be the landing page), Contact (a form—mostly people can communicate with me in the Comments section, as I'll continue to read all the comments), Books, Settings, and, possibly, social media icons. The Books tab will go to a Book of the Month page—I plan to journey to the Eastman Museum or some other good photo bookshop within striking range (even Boston or NYC) and look at books, and pick one that's worthy of our attention. Then on the books page I'll post a thumbnail image of the cover, the title with a link to Amazon, and a short review. I tried to do this for a while with a "Book of the Week" version, but it was too much work to do every week and I really feel I should see the book myself, the paper and the ink in person, before I recommend it. Besides, I should be up to date on at least some current photobooks, so the effort will educate me.

Settings will be for "mechanical room" stuff, Comment Guidelines, the RSS feed, recent posts, that sort of thing. 

One big question is whether each post should have a "Continue Reading" button after a few paragraphs, or appear whole and complete right there on the main page. I know some people like just being able to read straight through without clicking around, but I think newcomers are put off by long posts and don't immediately "get" that there are other posts! So I'm leaning to an intro with a "Continue Reading" button at the end. Besides, that will help me to be more focused about writing ledes. We all know how I can get prolix (wordy) and take my time getting to the point. (I should also stop using words on the difficulty level of "prolix," which is used .01 times per million words and is unknown to perhaps 98% of native English speakers. The blog shouldn't be a vocabulary test).

As for social media icons, I don't understand them or how they work. Some people say if readers click on a social media icon (Facebook, Instagram) on a website, it takes you to their social media site, to allow them to share what they just read. Other people say the icons will take them to my (the writer's) social media sites. The former would be good, the latter not so much—my problem being that I don't have any social media accounts. I have enough work to do just maintaining and keeping the conversation going on TOP. So I'm not sure if the new site will have social media icons or not. 

One thing that's long been a sore point is how illustrations are going to be handled. I'll describe what I'd ideally want and you see what you think. The second option is a real thing that I've seen in the wild, so it's theoretically possible. 

What I'd like is two classes of illustration. The first would be a nuts-and-bolts kind of thing that imparts information but isn't aesthetic. That can just be a standard size that fits the width of the column or smaller and doesn't enlarge. 

For aesthetic images I'd like them to click open on a whole screen such that the image is seen uncropped and surrounded first by a narrow band of white, and then on a background (roughly the proportions of an overmat) of Zone VI or Zone V gray. Then, if the image size allows it, a further click should enlarge it to 100%. The next click returns you to the blog. I'd make an illustration of this (a desktop computer with an image like this showing on it) except it's beyond my skills. 

I have seen this in the wild, honest, and it's just right. I have my grail. We'll see if we can actually implement it on the new site. Wish us luck. 

A final comment: many people know I'm an alcoholic in recovery (my anniversary was yesterday—35 years clean and sober), and a member of the granddaddy of 12-step programs, which must not be named because we don't represent at the level of press, radio, and films (and television and social media and ostensible photo blogs). I use the program as the basis for my spiritual life, and I've found that the more you put into it, the more you get out of it. It's been wonderful as an engine of personal growth for me. But here's the point: I never, ever would have gotten into it in the first place except that I had to. I'm an introvert and a loner and I go my own way. I'm not a joiner and I always had trouble feeling like I belong—even in the bosom of my own families, nuclear and extended. But alcohol left me sick, miserable, trapped, and desperate—so much so that I had to get help. It was that, or continue on toward a pathetic early death. I had tried my best to get well on my own and I just could not. So I was forced into my recovery strategies and programs by absolute necessity. 

See the analogy? Back when I realized TypePad was going downhill, I tried ten times in the intervening years to migrate TOP to a new platform (if you go to theonlinephotographer.net you will see a two-year-old aborted try on Wix, which I futzed with for a torturous four hours and then abandoned). Each time I was driven into the rocky shoals of my ineptitude and gave up. So this is good for me, in a way. I'd never have actually finished this migration to a new platform, except now I have to. 

By the way, I'm also thinking about doing two other new blogs, one about WFPB and one about electric cars. I have a lot of interest in both that remains untapped despite their regular intrusions into what is supposed to be a photography blog. So I might just spin those off. 

It's been fun to think of things afresh. More news as I have it. Thanks for sticking around. This too shall pass.

Mike

Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)

What Just Happened?!

10 September 2025 at 22:06

IMPORTANT NOTE: The way to get to me (The Online Photographer a.k.a. TOP) in the future will be to go directly to...

theonlinephotographer.com

...which is my domain that I own and can control.

theonlinephotographer.org  should work as well. All the old TypePad links will go dark after September 30th. Please make note of the new URL and, if you can and wouldn’t mind helping, please spread the word!

Every now and then in life, you get a wild ride that you didn’t see coming. Or rather, it’s like a sign I saw on a city bus in D.C. many years ago. The sign, above the automated side door of the bus, said "WARNING: Door May Close Without Warning," below which some wag had written 'Not any more it won't."

Both were right, in a way. The sign's warning is general, and it means you won’t get any notice that the door is closing at any specific moment. You get it.

So that’s the warning I had about the demise of TypePad, the blogging platform that has been TOP’s home for 17 years. Generally, the handwriting had been on the wall since 2020, when they stopped accepting new customers. Specifically, though, the end hit me like a lightning bolt from blue sky.

On August 27th, TypePad announced it would be shutting down—on September 30th. That gave slackers like me a month and three days to do two important things: 1.) prepare existing content (I have quite a lot of it, as you might know) for migration and make sure backups were all in order, and 2.) get a new site built somewhere else. That would have been hard enough. A mere seven days later, though, on September 4th, TypePad experienced some sort of unexplained but catastrophic crash. Probably, all their clients were bombarding their servers with requests to retrieve content—I know that’s what I was doing. TOP vanished from the Web. It seems to be back up now (thanks, TypePad team...they're working very hard and dealing with a lot of ¢R@p, I'm sure). 

With the help and input of lots of people, including Gordon L., Alex B., Martin Q., Chris C., Chris F., Richard T., and Robin H.—and others, not forgetting them—I decided that the imperative was to get a new site up quickly. That's what you'll see if you go to theonlinephotographer.com or .org now. It's a "Coming Soon" page as I write this...or should be; soon it will be a temporary placeholder site, and after that it'll be a customized self-hosted Wordpress-dot-org site built with professional help. As for an archive site with old posts, well, all in good time.

We're not out of the woods yet. This amounts to what magazine people used to call a relaunch, and it was well understood in the magazine world that relaunches were essentially just as perilous as inaugural launches of new titles. Old habits and old expectations get broken, existing customers have trouble finding you, and circulation (called traffic on the Web) takes a dip.

But—as Jack Nicholson’s character in The Shining said, “I’m baaa-ack!”

I sure am glad. Wild days indeed. I have to say, though, I'm really going to miss the old site. It's as comfortable as the proverbial old shoe. I'm so used to writing in its compositor that I have trouble with all other word-processing programs. I suppose I'll have to adjust.

Still a lot of work to do yet, but hopefully I'll be around here for the rest of the month. Then on to v.3 (this is the second incarnation of TOP. The new one will be v.3).

Another quote, from a now-ancient TV show: "And awaaay we go!"

Mike

Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)

First Update on the Great Update

31 August 2025 at 16:43

Ed. note: TypePad, TOP's home for 17 years, is going out of business on September 30th and wiping its contents from the Web. I'm scrambling to build a new site and archive the old one before that happens. I'll be keeping regular readers and old friends updated on the process as we go along. Feel free to skip these if you want—it's just nuts 'n' bolts housekeeping, if that's not mixing metaphors. This is hopefully temporary, just for the month of September. Come back on October 1 and see how we did! —Mike 

After failing to export TOP using its own export feature, and failing to make a fully usable backup with either Sitesucker or Sitefetcher, I'm resorting to backing up the entire site manually. TypePad creates a file of all posts for any specific month, as you can see under the header "ARCHIVES" at the bottom of the right-hand sidebar when you look at the full site on a desktop. If I open one of these in Safari, and go to File > Save as...  with a destination folder and "Format: Web Archive" set in the dialog box, I can create a copy of that month's archive that will open in Safari even when I'm offline. Unfortunately, although it preserves all Featured Comments, the other comments from the main comments section are missing, as are the larger versions of the pictures and illustrations. 

If I do the same thing in Firefox (in Firefox you go to hamburger stack > Save page as... and then set a destination folder and select "Format: Web page complete") it preserves a copy of the archive web page that will open in the Firefox browser offline, but Firefox also preserves a second folder with all the larger JPEGs in it. So that's good. But still, the full comments sections are lost. 

I'm pretty happy I've been doing the Featured Comments all these years. Those will be preserved. I sure hate to lose all the other comments, though. There are some very useful things in amongst 'em.

If I go to one single post and save that web page in this way, then all the comments in addition to the Featured Comments are preserved. But while I can save all the monthly compilations with maybe half a day's or a day's work, it's too much work to save all the posts individually—there are 9,369 TOP posts on TypePad. Even if I could put in the time, I know myself, and I know I'm not good at repetitive detail work. As I get progressively more bored and distracted my efficiency and effectiveness deteriorate and I start making mistakes. I'm not the person for such a job. (I should have been doing it all along, but, well, I didn't.)

The saved files open, as I've said, when I'm offline, but they open from within the browser they were saved with. I'm not exactly sure why or how that's the case. But it occurs to me that some future change to the browser could make it so that my archived backups won't open any more. I don't know how to guard against that. I'm thinking I should probably save all the monthly archive compilations in both Safari and Firefox, just to hedge against either one of the browsers breaking the old files sometime in the future. I'm also going to pursue the permissions that would allow Sitefetcher to work (there's a list of troubleshooting steps but I don't understand any of it myself. Maybe I can find somebody to help).

So that's where I am on backups.

As far as hiring a developer, I've interviewed three outfits (unclear whether they are individuals or companies with multiple people) on freelancer com. Most of the freelancers there appear to be based in the Indian subcontinent. They typically quote low hourly rates ($15–$25) but then estimate high numbers of hours to build a Wordpress.org blog site (60–80 hours). I'm feeling like the blind man exploring the elephant when it comes to hiring a developer—I don't know the landscape at all. Plus, I keep waffling between Wordpress and Squarespace, which isn't helping. This is not going to be the month to be indecisive, Mike, I say to myself. Probably not the time to try to cheap out, either. Wouldn't you know this would happen right after I bought a new-to-me car for the first time in 11 years...had I known this was coming, I would have held off on the car. Same thing happened to me with the mono camera, as some people might remember. But you know what they say: Oh well.

More updates as we go forward...feel free to skip these if you want! But on the other hand, comments sure are welcome. They let me feel less alone if nothing else. It's not always easy being a one-man band. 

Mike

Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)

Featured Comments from:

What Features Would You Like to See on a New TOP?

29 August 2025 at 23:22

I know I have asked this question before, but it's been a few years and I can't find it. Anything you want to see? Now's the time to say something, for sure. 

I'm very energized by this morning's work. I ran my plans past my friend Gordon, and he had some valuable input. My next task is twofold: 1.) to set a schedule for completion of the various stages toward completion, and 2.) to come up with a list of features I want on the new blog, divided into "must have" and "nice to have" categories. (One of Gordon's ideas.) 

I chose a theme based on the way it handles pictures. I think you'll really like this. By clicking on a picture in a post you will first see it enlarged but uncropped on a non-distracting background, and then if the file is larger you'll be able to zoom in to the limits of the file size. That means I can finally meaningfully present artwork as well as illustrations. Moderated commenting is of course a must-have. Another of Gordon's ideas is that we won't port over all of the old blog; we will have an archive section for old posts from the last 17 years on TypePad*, but these will be a curated and limited selection. And they'll be indexed, by category, title, and date. I also know people want a reliable and robust RSS feed. Naturally the new site will be responsive, as Mike catches up to 2012 with a whooosh

I'm on the verge of hiring a developer, a decision which should be reached by tonight (four days ahead of the timetable).

Let me hear from you! 

Mike

*And maybe even a few of my old posts from the first two years on Blogger, columns from Black & White Photography and Darkroom User magazines in the UK, editorials from Photo Techniques, and ancient articles from Camera & Darkroom née Darkroom Photography where I got my start...before it was owned by Larry Flynt! Maybe even a few articles from my student days in Washington D.C., like my notorious article about Richard Avedon. Hey, I was young.

Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)

Featured Comments from:

The Online Photographer Will Be Relaunching (Blog Note)

28 August 2025 at 23:03

This is a pretty major announcement. Existential, possibly, even, for this site. 

It's time for another reset. The Online Photographer has been on TypePad since 2007, and on the Web since November 2005. Unfortunately, we will not quite celebrate our 20th anniversary here: TypePad announced yesterday that it is closing down at the end of September and that all content will be removed from the Web. Including all of TOP. For me, it's a lot of content and not much time. Jeez.

So I'm starting by making fresh backups of everything and will immediately begin the task of building anew on a different service. Whether I can export the old content over or not is something I do not know. They certainly didn't give us a lot of notice...at least not specifically; the handwriting has been on the wall for a while now. I probably should have done something by now, but, you know, hindsight is 20/20. (Ironically, 2020 is when I should have done something. Let's move on.)

I'm leaning toward relaunching on SquareSpace (or perhaps Hostinger or Wix)* and am now actively looking for professional help with that. I would welcome your comments! Not something I know much about.

Does anyone know a good SquareSpace or Wix site designer who might be available, um, soon? I've tried and failed to build my own SquareSpace site in the past. 

Dangerous pivot point? 
This is a "dangerous opportunity," as John F. Kennedy used to say in his speeches. He said it was the translation for "crisis" from the Chinese. I'm told that's not quite correct. The Chinese word for crisis is wēijī (危机), the first character (wēi, 危) meaning danger and the second (, 机) meaning a turning point or inflection point.

But it's time. Maybe this will be good for me. This old site had gotten clunky, ineffective, and kind of fusty—it's not responsive, and there's zero SEO. Basic functions have been deteriorating. For one thing, simply loading illustrations on to the site has gotten extremely problematic and frustrating in recent months, soaking up a lot of time and leading to regular frustration.

Can't say I'm happy with the short notice—awkward time for this to happen, since I'm also in the run-up to a medical operation with a long recuperation period—but maybe we'll be okay.

Any advice, information, opinions or thoughts?

—Mike, the mostly incompetent TOP IT guy

*I've made multiple attempts to come up to speed with WordPress and it's just too complicated for me. I'm an "old dog" in the Learning Tricks Dept. The simpler this can be, the better. Also, I know a lot of people like the idea of Substack, but affiliate links can't be used in emails, so I'm leery of launching on anything that's basically an email newsletter. I'd like to continue as a classic, plain, old-style free blog.

Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)

Featured Comments from:

Comments to the EV Post

4 August 2025 at 03:43

[I got behind on the comments (I've had to focus on the car purchase process, doubly so since there is so much more to learn this time) so I'll publish the "Featured Comments" to the EV post here. The comments are out of order; they're usually in some semblance of the order in which they came in. "Featured Comments" is meant to be a sampling. The remainder of the comments will appear underneath the original post (below this one) as usual (they're all posted now). Sorry for the delay. It's been a wild week, and very full. In honor of the subject, commenter names in an appropriate color. —Mike]

-

Now: EV = Electric Vehicle

15 years ago: EV = Electronic Viewfinder

65 years ago: EV = Exposure Value

:-)

-

R. Edelman: "Mike, you got a fantastic deal on the Ariya. You deserve it! I have a friend who owns one. They are very nice vehicles. I believe they are made in Japan, which means good quality. I own a [Nissan] Leaf, which has been reliable, and dealer service has always been good. If you plan to travel with it, streamline payments by signing up with one or more of the charging networks that are available. I think that you will be quite happy with it. Enjoy!"

AN: Agree. I’ll just add two points: 1.) There are already more EV chargers up and down those highways than most people think (chargers are found via apps, not signs or billboards). 2.) Once you get used to the different paradigm, it’s often possible to charge while running errands or traveling (e.g. the car charges while you shop, or eat lunch, or do whatever it is you plan to do other than driving that day). I’ve been traveling for the past five days, and I’ve only waited for a charge once, for about 15 minutes. Otherwise all charging has taken place while doing something else that I needed or wanted to do anyway."

William Giokas: "Good luck with your new EV. The Winter will be the test on how well your new EV will perform. Your range will drop and effect how many long-range trips you can make in the Winter."

Fons (partial comment): "We take our Tesla on long distance trips. We have gone from the home base in The Netherlands all the way to the south of Spain, north to Norway, and east to Montenegro. On those trips, we need to spend a bit of time at the superchargers, of course. On average, we have to take a 30-min. break every 2.5 hours. So we can supercharge 24 times, and still spend less time at the fuel station than if we would go with one of our old cars. Most of the time we combine our charging stops with a nice break to get something to eat or drink. Or you can just go for a little walk. Or in case you do not want any of those things, you can just play a game or watch a movie on the onboard entertainment system.

"On longevity of the battery: our car nears 10 years, and its range has reduced by 15 km in the last five years, or less than 5%. Longevity of the tires is something else altogether.

"Side note, we actually kept our Mazda MX5 for a few months after switching to the electric. Although it was a fantastic car, and heaps of fun to drive, it never left the garage after the Tesla arrived. But with all of these things, YMMV."

Carlos Pessoa: "You make a great point about how EVs require a shift in how we think about refueling. But I believe their usefulness depends heavily on whether you can actually charge at home. Take my case, for example: I live in an older apartment building where installing an EV charger in my parking spot—or anywhere in the garage, for that matter—isn’t allowed. And that’s not unusual; it’s actually the norm where I live. So for people like me, range anxiety (loved that term, by the way) would be a daily reality, not just a theoretical worry. In that sense, EVs absolutely have a place—but I think the use case is narrower than many assume, especially for those of us without access to home charging."

Daniele (partial comment): "The biggest problem I see is too much powerful interests touched by this. Energy model change does not come easy, as is blatantly obvious these days on so many fronts. I went through the phase you're in now (let's call it obsession?) when the first Leaf and Zoe were out; four years ago, I finally got a Peugeot e-208 with a real range of about 150 miles as a first car for the family! And I live in a rural area to boot. In four years, I drove almost 50k miles on it, including long round trips. I just got used to how to manage things and it has been more than OK. I recently got a Kia EV6."

Thomas Mc Cann: "I let my battery drop to 50% and then top up to 80%. Eighty percent is better for the battery apparently. I previously had a BMW i3. This had a small BMW motorcycle engine which cut in when the battery got low, to recharge the battery enough for 40 more miles. I never suffered range anxiety."

Polestar 4

Polestar 4 EV

Craig Beyers: "When I lived in a single-family home and commuted ~40 miles round trip for work, an EV would have been logical for transportation, except for the several 500+ miles round trip trips each year. Now, when I’m retired and live in an apartment, an EV isn’t very logical—and I have the same long trips. Why? I can’t install a charger at my apartment and would have to drive to a charger, plug in, wait for the charge, and pay retail for electricity. I could cope with long-distance by driving two hours, taking a break, including charging, and continuing on. Charging time would extend my trip but not onerously. I’d still have to pay retail for electricity, but the cost would be tolerable. Purchasing an EV to replace a paid-for gas vehicle also doesn’t make sense. So, while I’d like an EV, there’s no logical reason to buy one. I’m both disappointed and relieved."

Tim McGowan: "Congratulations. Thoughts become Actions. Updates—we need progress reports. Will this help you get out and do more photography?"

Mike replies: tl;dr version: Yes. For the longer version, it's complicated, so I think the full answer should be reserved for a future post.

John Kauk: "Congratulations on the EV purchase, Mike. I hope you enjoy the experience. I've driven an EV since 2018, beginning with a Tesla Model 3, which I traded recently for a Rivian R1S. EVs are great for day-to-day, and I find them really good for travel as well."

Scott: "My wife has had her electric vehicle for more than 1 1/2 years, and hasn’t visited a public charging station ever. She loves not having to stop to refuel, as one does with ICE vehicles. She just plugs the car in whenever it needs a charge, in our garage. The car gets a bit over 300 miles (~500km) on a charge, so we could do more driving than I ever want to do in a day with only one stop. Of course, if you don’t have a garage or other private parking, you will need to use public charging stations. I was in London last month and in some residential areas,the streetlights have been outfitted with outlets which can be used to charge your car."

james wilson: "My RAV4 plug-in hybrid is the answer. I drive all-electric in town and have the gas engine for long trips or when I forget to plug in. It is fast. Loads of power at a touch of the pedal at any speed. My battery range is about 40 miles but I rarely stomp on the pedal. YMMV."

Mike replies: PHEVs are simultaneously the best of both worlds and the worst of both worlds. That's a longer subject too. Of course they probably make the most sense right now. I started this journey looking at hybrids. I absolutely loved the new Honda Civic Hybrid, which is essentially an electric car with an Atkinson-cycle engine as a generator and for direct drive in the final highway gear. It's actually a transmissionless vehicle. It can get 60 MPG if you read owners' reports. And I can attest that the interior is a decided step up from Toyota's competition. 

Daniel: "A major slice of the car-owning population is always left out of these discussions. Car owners who don’t have a personal garage in front of their homes to park and charge the car. People who live in apartments and cities. In America this may be a minority, but it’s a big minority. What is the solution for these millions of people to charge their vehicles?"

Mike replies: Writ much larger, this is very much like the transition to digital cameras. At first, skepticism, concern and puzzlement were widespread and significantly justified. But the broader landscape today (smartphones for 60% of the world's population) is radically different than even the most passionate of pioneer adopters were envisioning in the 1990s. I suspect this will echo in the EV transition as well. Certainly we will not be burning oil derivatives at the point of use for transportation in 2100, or even 2050. But I'm not deluded enough to think I can say what the situation will actually be then. When my dear friend and BTZS founder Phil Davis was nearing the end of his life, he said the thing he regretted most was that he didn't get to see what was going to happen. Ditto!

Ragnar Våga Pedersen: "Turning the car(d)s. Worth seeing."

Ioniq 6 copy

Hyundai Ioniq 6 EV

Jeff Hohner: "You nailed it. When we got our EV (a 2024 Hyundai Kona EV) we rejoiced in its quiet, its acceleration and its economy. But the thing we found ourselves enjoying most about it was unexpected: no longer having to visit the gas station! We charge at home. At first, we charged with the level one charger that came with the car. Several months later we got a level two charger (a FLO Home X5 7.2kW). We run the car’s battery down to 20% as recommended by Hyundai, then charge it to 80%, again as recommended. The L2 charger does this easily overnight, even with the charger throttled back to 20 amps (the battery prefers slower charging). A setting in the car schedules charging to start at bedtime. If we’re getting close to 20%, we just plug the car in after coming home from work, and the car’s soft female voice intones, 'Charging scheduled.' We’re living in the future! as Talking Heads sang in 1977."

Peter Barnes: "You got it Mike. The ABC of charging EVs: Always Be Charging. Yes, ICE cars refuel fast, but you have to be there. EVs can do what ICE cars can't—refuel while unattended. You are home, your car is sitting in the carport/garage/driveway until you need it again tomorrow—plug it in. I have owned an EV for six years, no other vehicle. Can't remember having range anxiety. The only people I know with range anxiety are people thinking about buying an EV. None of my friends with EVs have it; it is a condition that seems to cure itself within days of the EV arriving."

David N (partial comment): "Mr. Johnston, I don’t mind your EV articles at all. You study your off-topics and have what I consider a good approach. Maybe I missed a post, but please also consider the privacy invasiveness of new cars generally, if you haven’t already. They are rolling surveillance machines that record and broadly distribute data about you and your driving. Round about a year ago Mozilla Foundation published a study on it."

Mr Pak Ming Wan: "I rented an EV in California for the first time earlier this year. I too expressed range anxiety with the rental car assistant, but he said to me this: 'You will see that in California an EV is more convenient than you might imagine.' He was right.

"But what I found surprising was the change in social habits, as you mention. Parents would drive to charging stations in the evening with their kids and watch Netflix with them whilst charging. Shops had chargers as a destination for customers—I got into the habit of combining my visits to CVS and Target with charging. The office had charging stations so going to work was charging too. It was really a low lift to go electric there."

Mike replies: For some of these reasons, a few months ago Walmart announced a heavy commitment to installing its own charging stations in Walmart and Sam's Club parking lots. Their hope is to equal the largest network—Tesla's Supercharger network—in five years, which took Tesla 15 years to do. (Read a short statement of Walmart's purpose by John Higham, Electrical Vehicle Association Board Member.)

Jimmy Reina: "Living in California, we probably have a distorted perception of the availability of charging stations, but my own conclusions are...the market will deliver. No 19th-century capitalist worth their salt ever said, 'Wow look at all these gasoline filling stations, maybe we should invent a horseless carriage powered by an internal combustion engine.' This is not a chicken/egg situation, but a 'necessity is the mother of invention' situation. Having said that, there has always been range anxiety. In the early days of the automobile, it was not uncommon to see a can of fuel mounted on the fender or running board."

Frank Hamsher (partial comment): "Your comments are spot on. We have 2.5 years of experience driving an EV. In that entire time, the only time we have had to use a public charge station was while we were waiting to have a dedicated mains power socket installed in our garage so that we could charge the car without risking an overload on other house circuits. [...] Primary emotion: LOL as we drive by the petrol stations! I calculate that we are saving A$1,500 per year."

Walfredo Cirne (partial comment): "Please keep writing OT topics you are highly interested in, Mike. They are fun to read. Let me offer you one suggestion to research. Consider an e-bike. Not as replacement for your car. But in addition to it."

Gary Merken: "I'm thinking of the times I drove from southwest Connecticut to northeast Florida in one day. A distance of about 980 miles. Leaving Greenwich at 5:45 a.m., I would never had made Jacksonville by 9:15 p.m. if I'd had to stop for 45 minutes two or three times along the way to recharge."

Andrew: "Never going to a gas station is the best thing about an electric (or plug-in hybrid) car. This is why I think you should try an L1 charger before worrying about an L2 charger. If a slow trickle is sufficient to top you of overnight, then why bother getting a faster charger? Will you even notice if it finishes charging a few hours earlier?"

Mike replies: I'll be doing that at first. I get the car tomorrow (Monday the 4th), and my electrician can't come install the 240v outlet until early September. (Tradesmen are hard to get up here.) So I'll be Level 1 for a month or so. (For anyone who hasn't been following along, Level 1 is sourcing power from an ordinary 120v household outlet, like the kind in your living room.)

schralp: "You hit the nail on the head; best thing about an EV is always having a 'full' tank—actually, 80–90% for best battery hygiene. I got mine in 2018 and rarely care about range. The key when you do take a road trip is to stop for brief top offs in the 20–80% range where they charge the fastest. I rarely stop for more than 10 minutes. Again though that is a tiny minority of my use case. Never going to the gas station is awesome and the electricity is a bargain compared to gas."

[Thanks to all commenters, featured and not.]

Mike

Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)

Featured Comments from:

Chris Killip (and a Blog Note)

30 July 2025 at 13:20

I've been ill. Spent the whole night on Monday in the ER. Not serious, not chronic, and not important, but it was an ordeal. I'm recuperating. 

Life happens.... 

Killip

Meanwhile, Oren and Carl (old friends, of each other and, later, of me—Oren can be seen here and Carl here) have discovered the Chris Killip Foundation website. There's a beautiful brief selection of photographs from each of several of his projects. Go to the site and then to "Images" and have a look. I think this work deserves extended viewing, even meditation if that's not too much to say. His great 1988 book In Flagrante is hard to obtain, and I've never actually seen a copy. It would be nice to have more of the work online if the presentation were as good as it is on the website. (Why can't whole books be presented online? I guess it's not done because then no one has to pay, and photographers need money too. But when the books aren't available and the photographer is no longer with us....)

I never quite had a handle on Chris Killip while he was alive, I'm sorry to say. So I've been reading bits and pieces of biography from here and there. The Wikipedia article on him is a good place to start. 

Back soon.

Mike

P.S. I'll be working on catching up with comments today and tomorrow.

Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)

Featured Comments from:

"Kickers" and Link Hygiene (Blog Notes)

24 July 2025 at 19:00

I reckon I've moderated something within shouting distance of 330,000 comments in my nearly 20 years as a blogger online. I'm sure I haven't seen everything, but I've seen most things. Commenters self-select, but they also respond to the culture of a site—if you're consistent about what you want and reward, what you encourage and what you don't, you'll get the commenters you deserve. As you know, the commenters here are one of the best things about the site.

The Commentariat, though, is a subset of the readership, not the whole readership. And people in my position shouldn't confuse the two. People who comment anywhere (discounting the 2% who just love their own poop, as my friend Phil used to say) tend to be those who feel secure discussing the subject at a useful level.

There are two ways I think that claim can be objectively verified. One is that when I bring up a separate and different topic, we will hear from some commenters we never hear from otherwise, who know a lot about that subject. So if I bring up, say, nursing, or mountain biking, people with expertise or experience with those things will join the conversation—they know more about it than I know about it, and they know they do. The other proof is, how do you yourself feel when you drop in on a forum about something you know very little about? I don't know ab0ut you, but if I go to a forum for car mechanics, or one about finance, or one about learning Italian, I tend to shut the heck up. The reason is that I'm pretty certain I have nothing meaningful to contribute.   

Telltale
A sign that people are insecure about their own standing, in my opinion, is what I call "the kicker." A kicker is when someone has made their point and corrected another person they think is wrong, but then they have to ram their point home with a gratuitous insult at the end. Here's an example from a random year-old reddit thread (kicker in red): 

OP: With inexpensive Chinese EV's banned in the US, I wonder if people will buy them in Mexico and bring them into the US?

1st responder: Not gonna happen. You can’t import non-US market cars that are less than 25 years old. The process to make them US market compliant is not someone an individual or even a small company can do successfully.

2nd responder: I live 2 hours from Mexican border and see Mexican license plates everyday.

1st responder: Mexican citizens can temporarily drive their Mexican registered cars in the US for 90 days. That has absolutely nothing to the with the OP’s suggestion of a US resident buying a car in Mexico and bringing it back permanently. How you failed to understand the difference between these two things is completely beyond me.

Really? Completely beyond him? Funny, because I can easily understand how the 2nd responder thought his observation might be relevant. And actually, 1st responder is wrong: Mexicans can drive a Mexican-registered and -plated car here for up to one year, as long as they have a valid Mexican driver's license and insurance that comes up to U.S. standards. But note that kicker. In effect, "How can you be so ignorant as to argue with me?"

So watch for kickers—your own or other peoples'. It could be a sign that an overly positive writer is actually unsure of him- or herself. Why add the kicker if your argument is strong enough alone?

Bogus links
Anyone can fall for a bogus link*. I'm not playing holier-than-thou here, nor am I suggesting that any specific individual is to blame for "falling" for wrong information—actually, back in '22, when I wrote a couple of articles for a national magazine, the fact checker did so. She challenged something I wrote on a subject I'm so thoroughly versed in that I knew right away where she had gotten her information—she had fallen for a tendentious website that was spreading a false narrative, and she got there by just Googling the question. I knew all about the person who wrote the site she found, a known fraud. (And she wasn't wrong to ask me to defend myself.)

But most things aren't so easy. When people include links in comments here, it's generally a big headache. If I'm being conscientious, I have to check out the link before publishing it. Sometimes, I don't know enough to evaluate the veracity of the link without doing more research. And I have limited time for such things. For that reason, sometimes I'll just remove links from comments.

And sometimes, I learn later that I should have removed a link. The other day, I published a commenter's link to a site that claimed that the "electromagnetic fields" associated with electric vehicles can have deleterious health effects on people, especially people with heart disease or pacemakers. Turns out that's not true, and the author of the site that was linked is a known fraud. But I had to hear from someone with deep knowledge of the issue before taking down the link. 

I'm sure I've made mistakes like this...well, let's just be kind to me and say "not infrequently." But with 330,000 comments to vet, even over 20 years, we can't get everything right. Not everything I say is correct, either. My biggest advantage there is that I'm always willing to be corrected. If I make a mistake, I don't have such a big ego that I won't admit it. Of course, I'm also secure enough to argue the point if I still think I'm right.

One of the huge benefits of writing a site like this one is that almost no matter what I write about, I'm surely just about to learn a lot more about it...from you. 

Mike

*Although I'm always surprised when I do. I fell for this when it was broadcast—I went around for three days afterwards telling people about the astonishing thing Demi Moore did despite being pregnant. Why that one? I honestly don't know. I try to remember those instances where I fell for things that are obviously tricks, though—it keeps me humble. 

Original contents copyright 2025 by Michael C. Johnston and/or the bylined author. All Rights Reserved. Links in this post may be to our affiliates; sales through affiliate links may benefit this site. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. (To see all the comments, click on the "Comments" link below or on the title of this post.)

Featured Comments from:

❌